I love the thought of more insight & information for future projections, dev plans, etc… (ie: Roadmap); but would we be asking the dev team to be adding more to their plates than they are already doing? Then there is also the downside of needing to publicly defend a delay, or other issues when something doesn’t go as planned. Charles Hoskinson & Cardano is a great example of creating high expectations with timelines only to address the disappointed ADA holders and critics to what happened and why it happened and what the new future holds. Don’t get me wrong, Charles does a fantastic job! But with only 1 public face for TIME (Wonderland), we will be asking Daniele to step forward in this role and capacity. I honestly think he would better serve us (the TIME Stakers) continuing to do what he is doing.
Secondly, Daniele has a great mind and drive for this and we should continue to trust his vision and future path. We can see it coming together in his current collective work. He is creating a very sound and self sustaining financial ecosystem. Does everyone think the traditional global financial power brokers are just sitting on their hands watching the developments of these protocols and crypto ecosystems replace them? I would rather not hand over a public playbook (Roadmap) for them to devise schemes to weaken or attempt to destroy something as important as individual financial freedom and independence. This is just my humble opinion.