As a moderate non-leveraged investor I seek no blood. I also seek no penny-on-dollar return for my sunk cost.
What I seek is an earnest road forward and clearly defined plans with risk/reward profiles for my investment.
I believe we are all here to make legacy money. (our life better than our parent’s and our children’s lives better than ours.) Thinking that everyone touching wonderland will all “hodl” and never take profits is folly. Life happens, “pay me now, not later” will likely win for many in a crypto asset. These ‘temporary traders’ are not invested. These are a reality occurring along our journey.
To have any realistic investment though, we must have faith in both the plan, (proposed by team, approved by hodlers votes) and the leaders/executers of said plan.
Sifu and team have earnestly built an enviable treasury. For this, I thank him.
- Is it unfair to hold a leader to a higher standard than an average investor? No.
- Is it unfair for an average investor to expect more transparency from their leader when things go wrong? No.
- Is it unfair to lambaste a person who in earnest faith was reinventing him/herself after a plan was broken by cascading risky investor decisions forced said reveal? I would answer yes it is indeed unfair here. I hope this proves true.
I want wonderland to succeed. I want my investment to succeed. I believe Sifu, while involved, should step aside while the project continues.