Looking at things from the big picture, I see we are only in a good position if we act. Although we are not in a bad position if we do nothing either! Oye! We must prevent from being too safe otherwise we be sorry!
It is just as important to protect the project protocol and ensure its survival through continuous improvements and innovations as it is to ensure the treasury is utilized properly for any purpose we have and any market we face. I suggest we focus our attention on the blueprint protocol of Wonderland as it is now and how it can be expanded on to serve not only itself for all holders near and far, but also the whole ecosystem that is being shaped around us.
Our product is Revenue Share. The current rebase system that governs how the time token works has no place on our platter. This is clear. But rather than suggesting to strip the whole structure and consolidate the entire model of the project to wmemo alone, I offer the idea of restructuring and rebranding what wonderlands “rebase” system is and how it works or to replace it with a new purpose and a title for it that meets the description.
Beginning with the end in mind, the goal of my initial thought is to replace the existing rebase system ruling time token with a “redistribution” model that compliments what wmemo has in place and plans to further establish with it’s bsgg distribution model. While wmemo drips tokens held in the treasury when staked, time when staked will gain relative value as the treasury grows and is used for this specific purpose. This would ideally create complimentary friction between both of wonderlands tokens as well as further establish a working blueprint for Wonderland as both a profitable treasury and a low risk/growth oriented investing vehicle.
Cut out the 8 hour calendar and self replication distribution theme. For example, make “time rev share” a rebranded rebase model that works by adding value to its supply via buying time with profits made from the treasury and burning supply at double the rate in attempts to squeeze out some positive price action while long term momentum is established. The team can offer both time and wmemo products linearly, wmemo rev share kicks back to holders directly via drip distributions of collected assets, while time rev share (without a rebase) kicks back to holders indirectly through its support of the price of time as the treasury grows. This is not something I think could happen overnight as revenue from farms and directionals would be taken gradually to redistribute consolidated value… and possibly even increasing relative value of memo compared to time as reserves strengthen could be an option or variable within our control, then we could resume distributions once reserves are capped so that that growth of the treasury rewards the holder beyond just the represented returns created from price inflation. A duel model is more marketable to potential investors as well, having options goes a very long way when considering to participate.
At this point we would have a lot of power within the controllable metrics between time, memo, and wmemo , they could be pillars in the sense that they support each other for price stability and market action while both also serving as a pair of complimentary rev share services , this is my last fight for the rebase! But please share any feedback or ideas or criticisms, I will be happy to expand on this… take it further and refine it if the community shows favor!