just go look at the drops the past 8 hours, those are traders rebasing and pulling out
treasury pays when ppl pull out, thats why it is a treasury.
% numbers do not care about your trade size. Slippage is negatively affected by your size of transaction. We’re done here.
1 Like
You’re looking at the gas fee. I’m talking about the liquidity provider fee, which is 0.3% per transaction.
If u don’t believe me, try swapping 1000 usdc for usdt. You will end up with about 997 usdt, because of the 0.3% fee.
2 Likes
wrong, ive pulled out everything to test if i could. lost literally nothing
now apply that to 20 million dollars and rebases
0.3% fee on 20 million is 60k
2 transactions would mean they have to pay 120k in fees
A rebase is also 120k
So they will break even, IF there is no price slippage, which there always is. You will almost always lose money if u try this
1 Like
not if they do it over 3-6 rebases and dont swap their time but reinvest but scalp rebase profits, still profits and slippage isnt universal
i didnt lose more than a few bucks. just because someone else said something doesnt mean when you repeat it that its true
Show me a scenario where someone profits, with the math written out
I believe InvictusDao on Solana have solved this by removing rebases per x hour and implementing an automatic real time rebase. On their website, I don’t see a time until next rebase and at one point you were able to see your tokens go up constantly. It shouldn’t be too difficult for TIME to implement something similar if whales manipulating rebases is a serious concern.
4 Likes
do you have 20 million invested? Pull it all out 6.4 million every 8 hours over 3 rebases and see what happens, if price is going sideways you win
also just zoom in on the charts the past 2 weeks and look at 8 hour increments
Reinvesting means they’re taking a risk, so this strategy is not risk free
Why don’t u factor in the fees i told u about and try to see it’s profitable
crypto is not risk free, if you have Xmillions to play with on an experiment would you care if you lost a few 100k to figure it out? not fighting but i literally watch the charts and it is a pattern i have seen. I dont believe you should be able to stake 20 mill at a time, thats suit shit
As demonstrated by the math i have shown this not a risk free strategy and more than likely will result in a loss. If it’s so profitable i will welcome u try it yourself.
Also, all the trading fees go to the wonderland treasury, benefiting the stakers.
2 Likes
I’m pretty sure if this were real, you would have no issue convincing Sifu n Dani to alter the code. Except Sifu has stated it’s simply not happening. And that, even if it were, it would be helping the treasury and not affecting the price. The blanket repudiation of your entire point from one of the founders should be enough to end this debate. I’m appalled this continues to circulate. Remember- YouTube and TikTok content creators are not your financial ally in TIME- they earn their cash from views. Clickbait titles, fake controversies and general FUD drives those views up. Like the media, for them, chaos means profit.
5 Likes
This is incorrect. Unstaking does not come out of the treasury
3 Likes
Exactly, understand the tokenomics, minting deposits the asset in return for TIME which is back by the deposit. That can be sold on market which is where most of us got our time to start. The rebases aka APY is proped up by fees and treasury earnings and you could say minting as well… unstaking does not remove anything from treasury.
1 Like