pay-out CAN NOT be based on amount of TIME held. Long term holder (loyal frog) bought at price between 100K$ and last at 50K$. Unaetical wales/holders, just bought recently at discount price…
1 Like
Yes, I agree let us decide not the whales!!!
1 Like
Totally agree. We cant lrt this BS go through!!!
1 Like
Agree. The current snapshot vote is a joke, and these whales are just as bad as the scammers.
4 Likes
1m% !! Couldnt agree more
1 Like
Does that take a snapshot of TIME at a date before you could vote ? for example If I have 10+ TIME but its registered 3.6 TIME
Brewlabs, might be a replacement to manage the time wonderland funds. They might be worth looking at?? Just a suggestion
Totally AGREE with this proposal…shut down the oligarchy! frogs voice should be heard not whale sounds.
2 Likes
Fully agree, let’s play it fair.
2 Likes
I’ve been posting all morning that the vote is not fair and should be 1 wallet = 1 vote. REDO THE VOTE only count wallets that held strong before the liquidation and over the backing price. these whales are trying to steal the treasury by getting in at 17k and voting yes so they get paid on backing at 36k
this needs to be done immediately. I fully agree
1 Like
I support this, please try to move forward this A.S.A.P.
1 Like
Yes. We need this!!!
agree! like comment and share get this out there!
2 Likes
Agreed…give the frogs the power !
1 Like
Agreed as well, this is the only way this vote should be done. It’s very clear the majority do not want to shut down wonderland, but the majority doesn’t have millions like the top 10 people.
1 Like
Agree, This is unfair for all frogs
1 Like
small frogs count double
agree
I would even dare to say the smaller you are and the longer you’ve held the tokens, the more voting power you have.